Connect with us

News

Women face longer diagnosis times than men for the same pain types, data shows

Nearly one in three women feel their long diagnosis time is due to their healthcare professional not taking their pain seriously

Published

on

Women in the UK wait longer than men to receive a medical diagnosis for the same types of pain, new data has shown. 

The research, part of Nurofen’s Gender Pain Gap Index Report, found that less than half (47 per cent) of women surveyed received a diagnosis within 11 months compared to two thirds (66 per cent) of men.

Additionally, more women than men still do not have a diagnosis for their pain after 12 months or longer.

Nearly a third of women surveyed felt the reason it took so long to receive a diagnosis for their pain was because their healthcare professional did not take their pain seriously or dismissed their pain, compared to less than one in five (18 per cent) men.

The survey showed nearly half of women (45 per cent) who feel uncomfortable talking to certain people about their pain say they’re worried they will be judged as a “moaner”, compared to just 35 per cent of men who feel this way.

This translates into fewer women seeking help. Nurofen found 23 per cent of women surveyed have not tried to seek a diagnosis for the pain they experience, compared to 13 per cent of men.

The gender pain gap

Nurofen’s latest research shows the so-called “gender pain gap” has widened a year on since the brand’s first Gender Pain Gap Index Report, highlighting that more needs to be done to tackle unconscious gender bias in healthcare.

Last year’s data showed over half of women surveyed said they felt their pain was ignored or dismissed compared to 49 per cent of men – revealing a gender pain gap of seven per cent.

A year on, while fewer of the women surveyed than last year say their pain has been ignored or dismissed than men, the gap has widened to 11 per cent.

Dr Marieke Bigg, sociologist and author of This Won’t Hurt: How Medicine Fails Women, said: “It’s concerning to see that the gender pain gap has increased.

“Whether this means women are becoming more vocal about the problems they face, or whether medical sexism has intensified, we need to respond to this evidence and make changes to healthcare provision.

“Unfortunately, women’s pain is often dismissed. Healthcare professionals continually misattribute women’s symptoms to stress or ‘hormones’, while men are more likely to be sent for a physical check – even when complaining of the same type of pain.

“Over time, this has led to women’s pain being overlooked, resulting in a gender pain gap.”

She added: “Women are waiting longer to get a diagnosis for their pain, and do not feel empowered to push for the support they need. This is unacceptable.

“With initiatives like Nurofen’s Gender Pain Gap Index Report, we’re seeing more recognition of the issue. But we are still a long way from closing the gap. Women need to start feeling listened to and supported in getting the help they need.”

Dr Bill Laughey, senior medical scientist at Reckitt, the multinational that owns Nurofen, said: “Our latest research shows that fewer feel their pain has been dismissed – perhaps because awareness is driving better quality conversations between patients and healthcare professionals.

“Whilst a positive step forward, the gap has widened and this needs to stop. We’re calling on policymakers, the healthcare industry and medical stakeholders to come together to implement meaningful changes, such as effective gender bias training for all healthcare professionals.”

Nurofen has introduced free gender pain gap training for healthcare professionals, with two-thirds of Superdrug’s pharmacists, pharmacy assistants and nurses having already completed the training.

The brand has also partnered with the charity Wellbeing of Women to fund an innovative new piece of research.

The study, which will happen over three years, will investigate health literacy levels and attitudes towards menstrual pain in adolescent girls and women and address the impact these attitudes on women’s health journeys.

To receive the Femtech World newsletter, sign up here.

Insight

Drug turns off ‘master switch’ in aggressive breast cancer

Published

on

A drug targeting a key regulator in triple-negative breast cancer reduced tumour growth and cancer stem cell viability in laboratory models.

Triple-negative breast cancer is an aggressive subtype that disproportionately affects women under 40 and accounts for about 15 to 20 per cent of breast cancers.

The disease lacks receptors for oestrogen, progesterone and the HER2 protein, which are targeted by several cancer drugs, making it particularly difficult to treat.

Researchers from the National University of Singapore’s Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine investigated mechanisms that allow triple-negative breast cancer cells to spread and resist treatment.

They examined regulators of Wnt signalling, a pathway involved in processes including cell growth and movement, and identified a master regulator called DP103.

DP103 is a gene that controls a major biological process. The researchers found it creates a cycle in which cancer cells continue to grow and spread while resisting treatment and maintaining cancer stem cells linked to disease recurrence.

The team then investigated whether a targeted drug known as Supinoxin, or RX-5902, could block DP103 and its effects in triple-negative breast cancer.

Analysis of 21 samples, including patient tumour tissue, laboratory-grown breast cancer cells and organoids derived from local cancer patients, found that the drug reduced cancer stem cell viability by 40 to 60 per cent.

Tumour growth in laboratory-grown tumour models fell by about 50 per cent.

In laboratory models, treatment also reduced tumour size by around 90 per cent while largely sparing healthy cells.

It also extended survival, with half of the treated laboratory models reaching 70 days and beyond, compared with none in the untreated group.

DP103 had previously been identified as a biomarker for triple-negative breast cancer by a team led by Alan Prem Kumar, an assistant professor with the NUS Centre for Cancer Research and principal investigator for the new study.

RX-5902 is already being studied as a treatment for breast cancer, and Kumar said the findings could help identify patients who may be more likely to benefit.

“Our findings suggest that DP103 could potentially serve as a diagnostic biomarker to identify the patients most likely to benefit from RX-5902 treatment, paving the way for a more precise, personalised approach to treating triple-negative breast cancer,” he said.

“Instead of treating all patients the same, future clinical trials could focus on those whose tumours have high levels of DP103, where the therapy is expected to have the greatest impact,” said Kumar.

First author Cai Wanpei said RX-5902 could prevent beta-catenin, a protein whose mutation is associated with various cancers, from entering the nucleus of human cells and switching off genes that drive cancer growth and spread.

“This slows tumour progression and triggers apoptosis – the natural death of cancer cells,” said Cai, who was a PhD student at the NUS Centre for Cancer Research and NUS Medicine’s pharmacology department during the research.

Study co-author Celestial T. Yap said triple-negative breast cancer remains particularly difficult to treat because conventional treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy and immunotherapy may not work for all patients.

She said DP103 could represent a “biological vulnerability” in the disease.

“This discovery offers new insights that could support more precise patient selection and open the door to better targeted strategies for durable disease control and improved clinical outcomes,” said Yap, an associate professor with the NUS Centre for Cancer Research and NUS Medicine’s physiology department.

The researchers said abnormal Wnt signalling also drives several other cancers, meaning the findings could offer avenues for treating other aggressive cancers.

Their next steps include validating DP103 as a predictive biomarker in larger patient groups and further developing therapies targeting the regulator for clinical testing.

The team will also investigate combining RX-5902 with existing therapies to further improve treatment outcomes.

Continue Reading

Cancer

Federal gov should fund drug to treat breast cancer and endometriosis, Aus committee says

Published

on

Australia’s drug advisory committee has recommended wider funding of triptorelin for women with breast cancer or endometriosis.

The recommendation comes after AstraZeneca announced plans to remove Zoladex from the market, risking leaving more than 7,500 women with breast cancer without an alternative treatment.

Both medicines block the release of oestrogen and testosterone and can be used as part of treatment, or for fertility preservation, in some forms of cancer.

The Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee met urgently in July and recommended making triptorelin unrestricted under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), which would mean it was funded for all uses.

The drug has been listed on the PBS for prostate cancer since 2006.

Triptorelin and Zoladex can also be used to treat endometriosis and to block puberty for either precocious puberty or gender-affirming care.

Vicki Durston, director of policy and advocacy at Breast Cancer Network Australia, described the recommendation as “a significant step forward” and said access to the medicine could mean the difference between life and death for some patients.

She said some women had already chosen to have their ovaries removed because of uncertainty over Zoladex supplies.

Marilla Druitt, Victorian state chair of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, said it remained unclear whether triptorelin would work exactly the same way as Zoladex, but the recommendation was likely to be positive for patients with endometriosis and pelvic pain.

She said: “I’m glad we’ve got an alternative.”

“That’s fantastic, and it remains to be seen whether or not it will be as good, but pain is so complex, pain is a really hard thing to study because it’s got so many contributors.”

Druitt said further research would be needed after the medicine was introduced.

If accepted by the federal government, the recommendation would also allow PBS funding of triptorelin for puberty suppression in precocious puberty and gender-affirming care.

This would make gender-affirming care federally funded through the PBS for the first time and would remove a financial barrier for transgender children in Queensland and the Northern Territory.

Stuart Aitken, medical director of Gender Health Australia, said the recommendation had sparked “absolute joy” among his patients.

He said: “It takes away a huge barrier to accessing evidence-based care.”

“It means that the ban has a very limited effect.”

Continue Reading

Insight

Benchmarking 2027: Shifting priorities in US health infrastructure

Published

on

By Women’s HealthX

As healthcare organisations navigate tightening compliance mandates, evolving reimbursement frameworks, and shifting health economics, the single most critical asset for leadership is operational visibility into what their industry counterparts are executing right now.

Ahead of the Women’s HealthX marketplace in Boston this December, a cross-functional steering committee of health plans, hospital networks, biopharma innovators, and enterprise employers has launched the definitive 2026 U.S. Health Infrastructure Survey.

The objective of this brief, multi-state index is to bypass abstract market fluff and map out exactly how the country’s elite healthcare stakeholders are practically structuring their 2027 budgets, clinical protocols, and technology procurement guidelines.

Some of the questions we are asking:

  • Health Plans & Payers “What is the biggest operational barrier to expanding women’s health coverage?”
  • Health Systems & Providers “What is the biggest women’s health priority for health systems over the next 24 months?”
  • Pharma & Life Sciences “What is the biggest commercial hurdle facing women’s health innovation?”
  • Employers & Benefits Leaders “Which women’s health challenge creates the greatest workforce impact?”

By contributing just 60 seconds of your operational insight to the index, you will ensure your specific sector’s parameters are accurately represented.

In return for your participation, you will secure a priority, pre-ordered copy of the completed 30-page intelligence report when the final data drops this September!

See where your direct peer groups are drawing their line in the sand for the upcoming fiscal year.

Contribute 60 seconds and pre-order your national benchmark report

Women’s HealthX 2026 | From Rhetoric to Results

Encore Boston Harbor | December 3-4 2026

Bypass abstract market rhetoric to evaluate real-world health economics, regulatory compliance mandates, and care delivery systems.

Join the region’s foremost health plan medical directors, hospital COOs, biopharma innovators, and enterprise benefits buyers anchoring our 2026 tracks.

Review full agenda

Meet confirmed speakers

Secure your pass

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Aspect Health Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.